PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
73.47%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 1.43%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
212.90%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 3.48%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
37.68%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 8.13%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
86.36%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 8.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
42.07%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 12.18%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
43.14%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 8.76%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
43.14%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 8.75%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
0.09%
Share growth above Energy median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.09%
Diluted share growth above 2x Energy median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.23%
OCF growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see if a superior business model or cost structure drives strong cash generation.
45.43%
FCF growth of 45.43% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
456.78%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch would note a clear advantage in stable or growing demand.
-26.49%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -30.63%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-2.58%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -36.53%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-1063.10%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-523.38%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is -0.89%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-490.23%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is -26.81%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-311.40%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of -36.56%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
92.23%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a notable advantage vs. peers struggling to grow net income/share.
-132.84%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -33.05%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
33.48%
Equity/share CAGR of 33.48% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
-22.74%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
3.74%
Positive short-term equity/share CAGR while Energy is negative. Peter Lynch finds a relative advantage vs. sector-level slowdown.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.80%
AR growth of 10.80% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-4.45%
Decreasing inventory while Energy is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-2.01%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-1.03%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is -0.71%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
2.98%
Debt growth of 2.98% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-10.37%
R&D dropping while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-5.45%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.