PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
40.52%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 2.99%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
-124.82%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-481.19%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-2818.90%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-578.55%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-586.21%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-586.21%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.17%
Share change of 0.17% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.17%
Diluted share change of 0.17% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
478.71%
OCF growth of 478.71% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
293.13%
FCF growth of 293.13% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
554.41%
10Y CAGR of 554.41% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
28.41%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might identify a real advantage vs. struggling peers.
40.91%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a short-term advantage or a successful new product line.
643.25%
OCF/share CAGR of 643.25% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
156.27%
OCF/share CAGR of 156.27% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
1197.14%
Positive short-term OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch would note a strong competitive advantage in near-term cash generation.
-1257.38%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-133.75%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-1180.57%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-1.90%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-44.19%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-20.78%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -12.20%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.07%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-10.16%
Decreasing inventory while Energy is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-10.39%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-16.78%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-28.73%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-15.25%
R&D dropping while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-16.93%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.