PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
48.13%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 2.01%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
268.96%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 3.85%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
22.43%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 3.84%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
7.68%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 4.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
42.14%
Net income growth of 42.14% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
41.79%
EPS growth of 41.79% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
41.79%
Diluted EPS growth of 41.79% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.05%
Share growth above Energy median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.05%
Diluted share growth above 2x Energy median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.55%
OCF growth of 83.55% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
54.77%
FCF growth of 54.77% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
15.45%
10Y CAGR of 15.45% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
-36.17%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -21.23%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-31.06%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -30.62%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-6.52%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
28.49%
OCF/share CAGR of 28.49% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
22.80%
Positive short-term OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch would note a strong competitive advantage in near-term cash generation.
-458.30%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of -18.28%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
4.71%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a notable advantage vs. peers struggling to grow net income/share.
-259.26%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -29.69%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-53.50%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-46.51%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-52.35%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -8.12%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.82%
Receivables growth far exceeding Energy median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
-8.26%
Decreasing inventory while Energy is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-1.10%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-2.89%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
18.11%
Debt growth of 18.11% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
4.75%
R&D growth of 4.75% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-0.44%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.