PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
35.46%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 6.08%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
-171.55%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-922.43%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-930.10%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-948.31%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-946.15%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-943.59%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.00%
Share change of 0.00% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.07%
Diluted share change of 0.07% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
279.96%
OCF growth of 279.96% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
19.65%
FCF growth of 19.65% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
58.55%
10Y CAGR of 58.55% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
-17.44%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -5.63%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-46.77%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -8.92%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
23.68%
OCF/share CAGR of 23.68% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-71.13%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-63.14%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-6403.77%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-234.35%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-497.53%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 38.64%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-91.06%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-87.75%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-91.23%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -8.27%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.19%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-13.57%
Decreasing inventory while Energy is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-15.77%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-74.09%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-24.22%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-4.20%
R&D dropping while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
6.03%
SG&A growth of 6.03% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.