PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-40.45%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
144.12%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 6.27%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
83.79%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 17.71%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
81.76%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 17.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
79.61%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 8.44%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
79.66%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 4.46%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
79.61%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 3.82%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
0.49%
Share change of 0.49% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.43%
Diluted share change of 0.43% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-587.06%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is -3.50%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-259.95%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is -6.02%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-19.36%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-47.70%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -15.70%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-16.30%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-89.40%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-218.55%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-93.69%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-644.33%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-79.81%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-1039.85%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 44.03%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-70.19%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-56.85%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-69.96%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -7.02%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.38%
AR growth of 3.38% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
0.51%
Inventory growth of 0.51% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
4.23%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
139.76%
BV/share growth of 139.76% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
0.20%
Debt growth of 0.20% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-4.70%
R&D dropping while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-10.20%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.