PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-25.60%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is -12.82%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-60.64%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is -19.03%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
1.26%
Positive EBIT growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
-2402.01%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is -33.10%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-126.30%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is -59.63%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-121.25%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is -54.72%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-127.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is -56.47%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
10.75%
Share change of 10.75% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
13.64%
Diluted share change of 13.64% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7700.65%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is -19.73%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-934.80%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is -18.12%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-27.10%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-20.32%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -6.89%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
12.30%
3Y CAGR of 12.30% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
-635.26%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-23.78%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-16.38%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 1.34%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-106.42%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of -92.66%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
88.32%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a notable advantage vs. peers struggling to grow net income/share.
99.12%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a big short-term advantage vs. peers struggling with profit declines.
-99.63%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-99.51%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -11.58%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-99.06%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -4.09%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.60%
Slight AR growth while Energy cuts AR. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is missing an opportunity to collect faster or if peers face sales declines.
139.77%
Inventory growth of 139.77% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-8.03%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-15.74%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is -3.03%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-0.27%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-14.37%
R&D dropping while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-6.94%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.