PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
24.38%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 2.39%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
102.35%
Gross profit growth of 102.35% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
186.59%
EBIT growth of 186.59% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
1259.49%
Operating income growth of 1259.49% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
824.29%
Net income growth of 824.29% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
830.77%
EPS growth of 830.77% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
766.67%
Diluted EPS growth of 766.67% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.09%
Share change of 0.09% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.81%
Diluted share change of 0.81% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
134.63%
OCF growth of 134.63% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
125.80%
FCF growth of 125.80% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-79.51%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-27.17%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -0.16%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-57.44%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -10.06%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-96.52%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
104.06%
OCF/share CAGR of 104.06% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-74.13%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
52.21%
Net income/share CAGR of 52.21% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
357.82%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 35.94%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
159.44%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a big short-term advantage vs. peers struggling with profit declines.
-86.30%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-77.75%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -11.30%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
131.73%
Positive short-term equity/share CAGR while Energy is negative. Peter Lynch finds a relative advantage vs. sector-level slowdown.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reductions while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-12.53%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
18.21%
Inventory growth of 18.21% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
13.60%
Asset growth of 13.60% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
5847.50%
BV/share growth of 5847.50% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-26.60%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-38.72%
R&D dropping while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
48.07%
SG&A growth far above Energy median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.