PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.36%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is 12.85%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-33.63%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 27.05%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-110.42%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 53.21%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-105.75%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 50.79%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-111.73%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 52.33%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-111.98%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 48.89%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-113.46%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 47.87%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.55%
Share change of 0.55% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-14.46%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.02%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-367.05%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-441.53%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-61.76%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is -4.92%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-36.20%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-35.97%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -6.65%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
86.97%
OCF/share CAGR of 86.97% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
91.25%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 5.14%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
85.82%
3Y OCF/share growth of 85.82% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-1185.23%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
54.60%
5Y net income/share CAGR near Energy median. Charlie Munger might see standard mid-cycle performance in a healthy sector.
65.83%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 65.83% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
-87.55%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-78.76%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -6.47%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-38.27%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -10.01%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.32%
Receivables growth far exceeding Energy median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
9.55%
Inventory growth of 9.55% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-3.14%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-11.71%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.03%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
4.40%
Slightly rising debt while Energy median is deleveraging. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm lags behind peers in risk control or invests in more expansions.
53.13%
R&D growth of 53.13% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-9.08%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.