PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.83%
Revenue growth of 0.83% vs. zero growth in Energy. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
22.37%
Gross profit growth of 22.37% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
312.32%
EBIT growth of 312.32% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
1056.53%
Operating income growth of 1056.53% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
255.43%
Net income growth of 255.43% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
248.28%
EPS growth of 248.28% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
239.29%
Diluted EPS growth of 239.29% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.84%
Share change of 0.84% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
13.53%
Diluted share change of 13.53% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
154.55%
OCF growth of 154.55% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
139.78%
FCF growth of 139.78% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-70.49%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-41.23%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-43.85%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -1.36%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
111.77%
OCF/share CAGR of 111.77% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
105.87%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 16.82%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
114.73%
3Y OCF/share growth of 114.73% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
128.77%
Net income/share CAGR of 128.77% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
185.94%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 61.50%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
113.73%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 0.27%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-83.20%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-72.76%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -8.88%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
938.19%
Positive short-term equity/share CAGR while Energy is negative. Peter Lynch finds a relative advantage vs. sector-level slowdown.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.40%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
2.23%
Inventory growth of 2.23% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-3.02%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
22.02%
BV/share growth of 22.02% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-16.43%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-6.06%
R&D dropping while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
18.82%
SG&A growth of 18.82% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.