PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.76%
Revenue growth below 50% of Energy median of 9.65%. Jim Chanos would be concerned about potential secular decline.
-2.26%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 10.93%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-171.19%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 20.46%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
27.21%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x Energy median of 22.32%. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm if scale economies are a factor.
-212.19%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 21.41%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-213.95%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 23.54%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-225.64%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 22.36%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.14%
Share growth above Energy median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
-11.05%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.02%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-207.64%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is 8.27%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-221.36%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is 7.01%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-73.93%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is -2.05%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-64.53%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 10.15%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-38.36%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-162.53%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
85.23%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 28.75%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
88.04%
3Y OCF/share growth of 88.04% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
87.07%
Net income/share CAGR of 87.07% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
-66.36%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 83.17%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
23.38%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 23.38% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
-82.27%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-77.05%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
633.78%
Positive short-term equity/share CAGR while Energy is negative. Peter Lynch finds a relative advantage vs. sector-level slowdown.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.90%
Receivables growth far exceeding Energy median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
2.37%
Inventory growth of 2.37% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-7.62%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-17.46%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.18%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-3.83%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-36.77%
R&D dropping while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-9.80%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.