PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.82%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 8.11%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
-14.41%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 1.51%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
154.68%
EBIT growth of 154.68% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
-285.20%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
123.94%
Net income growth of 123.94% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
124.49%
EPS growth of 124.49% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
124.49%
Diluted EPS growth of 124.49% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.08%
Share change of 0.08% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
1.69%
Diluted share change of 1.69% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
89.83%
OCF growth of 89.83% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
53.97%
FCF growth of 53.97% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-61.45%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-69.98%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 7.16%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-31.34%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-101.02%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-100.40%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 13.69%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
92.53%
3Y OCF/share growth of 92.53% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
113.73%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 29.65% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
105.87%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Energy median. Mohnish Pabrai would check that top-line growth and share count management both contribute.
110.42%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 23.09%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-82.79%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-69.16%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
251.81%
Positive short-term equity/share CAGR while Energy is negative. Peter Lynch finds a relative advantage vs. sector-level slowdown.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.28%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-11.18%
Decreasing inventory while Energy is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
8.82%
Asset growth of 8.82% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
6.19%
BV/share growth of 6.19% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
1.24%
Debt growth of 1.24% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
46.53%
R&D growth of 46.53% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
49.72%
SG&A growth far above Energy median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.