PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.91%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is 6.11%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
41.64%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 9.56%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
-127.98%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 12.62%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
67.92%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 15.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
-262.89%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.17%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-258.33%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-258.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.21%
Share growth above Energy median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
-1.38%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4410.58%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-1144.84%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is -0.55%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-54.29%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-14.73%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 18.79%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-17.78%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 10.39%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
48.68%
OCF/share CAGR of 48.68% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
31.34%
5Y OCF/share growth 1.25-1.5x Energy median. Mohnish Pabrai would see if consistent operational improvements enable better cash yields.
40.35%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Energy median of 20.74%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
71.54%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 17.18% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
80.40%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Energy median. Mohnish Pabrai would check that top-line growth and share count management both contribute.
70.03%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 36.29%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-81.46%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-65.29%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
202.35%
Positive short-term equity/share CAGR while Energy is negative. Peter Lynch finds a relative advantage vs. sector-level slowdown.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.03%
Receivables growth far exceeding Energy median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
14.54%
Inventory growth far above Energy median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
1.03%
Asset growth 50-75% of Energy median. Guy Spier sees potential underinvestment or overcaution vs. peers.
-7.97%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.41%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-3.03%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
14.78%
R&D growth of 14.78% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
0.50%
SG&A growth of 0.50% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.