PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.27%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 9.28%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
12.71%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 6.74%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
-233.84%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 6.17%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-90.19%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 8.87%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-91.84%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 4.47%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-89.47%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 2.40%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-89.47%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 2.71%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.33%
Share change of 0.33% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.33%
Diluted share change of 0.33% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.66%
OCF growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if a superior business model or cost structure drives strong cash generation.
41.15%
FCF growth of 41.15% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-52.25%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
2.11%
Below 50% of Energy median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
-21.57%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 8.82%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
14.74%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 1.36% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
72.34%
5Y OCF/share growth 1.25-1.5x Energy median. Mohnish Pabrai would see if consistent operational improvements enable better cash yields.
43.59%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Energy median of 18.43%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
48.93%
Net income/share CAGR 50-75% of Energy median. Guy Spier would see lagging competitiveness in core profitability.
46.04%
Below 50% of Energy median. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper problems limiting mid-term profit potential.
-142.56%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 76.41%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-75.77%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-55.61%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
313.59%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 313.59% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.84%
AR growth of 15.84% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-9.40%
Decreasing inventory while Energy is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-2.18%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
16.14%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
1.70%
Debt growth of 1.70% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
47.80%
R&D growth of 47.80% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
20.84%
SG&A growth of 20.84% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.