PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.87%
Revenue growth of 13.87% vs. zero growth in Energy. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
29.38%
Gross profit growth of 29.38% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
510.02%
EBIT growth of 510.02% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
150.57%
Positive operating income growth while Energy is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
314.88%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 1.39%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
316.67%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.44%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
300.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 300.00% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.10%
Share change of 0.10% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
10.66%
Diluted share change of 10.66% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
90.53%
OCF growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 5.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see if a superior business model or cost structure drives strong cash generation.
68.62%
FCF growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see if high profitability or prudent capex drives outperformance.
-49.92%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-21.54%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 35.34%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-18.17%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 28.46%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
88.61%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 22.33% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
84.07%
5Y OCF/share growth 1.25-1.5x Energy median. Mohnish Pabrai would see if consistent operational improvements enable better cash yields.
88.00%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Energy median of 31.46%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
290.88%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 77.89% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
300.31%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 101.79%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
839.36%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 100.79%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-65.99%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-36.42%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
373.90%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 373.90% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.10%
AR growth of 18.10% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
2.57%
Inventory growth of 2.57% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
11.78%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.95%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
35.07%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-5.16%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-8.39%
R&D dropping while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-6.36%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.