PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-97.19%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is -4.33%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-15.10%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is -1.70%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
65.81%
EBIT growth of 65.81% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
53.01%
Positive operating income growth while Energy is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
65.32%
Positive net income growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
71.83%
Positive EPS growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
71.83%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
-71.98%
Share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-72.01%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
82.45%
Positive OCF growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong relative advantage in operational efficiency.
85.98%
Positive FCF growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might view this as a notable advantage over peers.
-96.39%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-91.67%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 16.82%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-88.57%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 31.49%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-124.40%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
90.42%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 22.71%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
57.28%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Energy median of 26.75%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
-136.70%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 25.40%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
69.14%
5Y net income/share CAGR near Energy median. Charlie Munger might see standard mid-cycle performance in a healthy sector.
30.87%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of Energy median. Guy Spier might worry about a partial underperformance vs. competitor norms.
-118.50%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
14.22%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 6.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
-182.52%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 31.60%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.27%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-98.94%
Decreasing inventory while Energy is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-96.97%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-199.02%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.50%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-81.21%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-100.00%
R&D dropping while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-47.57%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.