PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-55.26%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-139.07%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-91.94%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-25.85%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-65.77%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-30.00%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-30.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
149.04%
Share change of 149.04% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
149.04%
Diluted share change of 149.04% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.59%
OCF growth of 45.59% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
44.58%
FCF growth of 44.58% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-99.06%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-98.80%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 1.39%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-97.95%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 17.49%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
97.84%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 12.40% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
96.13%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 18.20%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
-117.25%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 33.40%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-219.65%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 44.14%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-115.25%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 49.79%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-129.85%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 73.89%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-107.24%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
32.36%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 3.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
-129.31%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 21.13%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.90%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-26.69%
Decreasing inventory while Energy is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-18.26%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
56.59%
BV/share growth of 56.59% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-2.59%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.47%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.