1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.24%
Revenue growth of 23.24% vs. zero growth in Energy. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
-253.92%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 1.82%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-554.55%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is -6.03%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-215.67%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is -7.14%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-390.49%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is -8.46%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-296.15%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is -7.38%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-296.15%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is -7.09%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-38.35%
Share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-38.35%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-697.99%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-612.15%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-98.55%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-97.80%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 14.47%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-96.08%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 15.87%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-15.34%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-12.63%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 17.41%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-107.79%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 15.61%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-523.77%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 15.15%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-882.15%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 76.16%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-111.99%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 34.59%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-117.92%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-61.98%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 5.49%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-189.42%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 25.73%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.77%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-70.14%
Decreasing inventory while Energy is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
223.24%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-151.68%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
191.33%
Slightly rising debt while Energy median is deleveraging. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm lags behind peers in risk control or invests in more expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
211.71%
Our SG&A slightly up while Energy is cutting. Peter Lynch wonders if we overspend or if the median underinvests in marketing.