PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
131.08%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x CSIQ's 89.20%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
47.11%
Cost growth of 47.11% while CSIQ maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
51.20%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of CSIQ's 89.20%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
78.88%
Margin change of 78.88% while CSIQ shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
-33.32%
R&D reduction while CSIQ shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while CSIQ shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
100.00%
Marketing expense change of 100.00% while CSIQ maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.37%
Operating expenses reduction while CSIQ shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
25.45%
Total costs growth less than half of CSIQ's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
100.00%
Interest expense change of 100.00% while CSIQ maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
92.71%
D&A change of 92.71% while CSIQ maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
74.59%
EBITDA growth below 50% of CSIQ's 184.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
89.00%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of CSIQ's 144.65%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
55.54%
Operating income growth below 50% of CSIQ's 184.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
80.76%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of CSIQ's 144.65%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-193.11%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
30.41%
Income change of 30.41% while CSIQ is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
69.89%
Margin change of 69.89% while CSIQ is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
100.00%
Tax expense growth while CSIQ reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.86%
Net income growth below 50% of CSIQ's 161.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
63.16%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x CSIQ's 38.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1378.57%
EPS decline while CSIQ shows 160.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1378.57%
Diluted EPS decline while CSIQ shows 160.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-94.15%
Share count reduction while CSIQ shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-94.15%
Diluted share reduction while CSIQ shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.