PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
43.00%
Revenue growth below 50% of CSIQ's 184.23%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
46.70%
Cost growth of 46.70% while CSIQ maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
23.23%
Gross profit growth below 50% of CSIQ's 184.23%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-13.83%
Margin decline while CSIQ shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
234.90%
R&D change of 234.90% while CSIQ maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.64%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CSIQ's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
38.89%
Total costs growth less than half of CSIQ's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while CSIQ shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-46.85%
D&A reduction while CSIQ shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-46.31%
EBITDA decline while CSIQ shows 252.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-62.45%
EBITDA margin decline while CSIQ shows 153.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
49.67%
Operating income growth below 50% of CSIQ's 252.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
64.80%
Operating margin growth below 50% of CSIQ's 153.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-28.66%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
114.77%
Income change of 114.77% while CSIQ is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
110.33%
Margin change of 110.33% while CSIQ is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
102.39%
Tax expense growth less than half of CSIQ's 339.96%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
139.84%
Net income growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
127.86%
Net margin growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
110.69%
EPS growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
109.67%
Diluted EPS growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
162.28%
Share count change of 162.28% while CSIQ is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
187.19%
Diluted share change of 187.19% while CSIQ is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.