PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
30.36%
Growth of 30.36% while CSIQ shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
19.25%
Cost growth of 19.25% while CSIQ maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
101.11%
Positive growth while CSIQ shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
54.27%
Margin expansion while CSIQ shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
29.66%
R&D change of 29.66% while CSIQ maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.75%
Operating expenses change of 18.75% while CSIQ maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
19.18%
Total costs change of 19.18% while CSIQ maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.88%
D&A change of 17.88% while CSIQ maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
140.53%
EBITDA growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
84.52%
EBITDA margin growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
665.55%
Operating income growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
533.85%
Operating margin growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
97.94%
Similar other expenses growth to CSIQ's 93.44%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
1926.57%
Income change of 1926.57% while CSIQ is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
1454.64%
Margin change of 1454.64% while CSIQ is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
1229.03%
Tax expense growth while CSIQ reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
2011.37%
Net income growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1519.69%
Net margin growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1804.76%
EPS growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2005.26%
Diluted EPS growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.77%
Share count increase while CSIQ reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.70%
Diluted share increase while CSIQ reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.