PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.26%
Revenue decline while CSIQ shows 30.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-9.58%
Cost reduction while CSIQ shows 23.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
22.85%
Gross profit growth below 50% of CSIQ's 130.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
28.33%
Margin expansion below 50% of CSIQ's 75.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-149.74%
R&D reduction while CSIQ shows 11.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.80%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CSIQ's 3074.41%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-6.33%
Total costs reduction while CSIQ shows 242.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.15%
D&A growth while CSIQ reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
40.41%
EBITDA growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
46.66%
EBITDA margin growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
64.97%
Operating income growth below 50% of CSIQ's 908.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
72.32%
Operating margin growth below 50% of CSIQ's 718.20%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-226.15%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-24.85%
Pre-tax income decline while CSIQ shows 1062.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.50%
Pre-tax margin decline while CSIQ shows 789.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
79.73%
Tax expense growth while CSIQ reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-42.17%
Net income decline while CSIQ shows 1047.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-39.59%
Net margin decline while CSIQ shows 777.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.00%
EPS decline while CSIQ shows 1000.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-42.80%
Diluted EPS decline while CSIQ shows 1000.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.93%
Share count reduction while CSIQ shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.67%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.