PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
31.20%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x CSIQ's 8.66%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
57.89%
Cost growth above 1.5x CSIQ's 10.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-78.20%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-83.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
11.79%
R&D growth less than half of CSIQ's 138.96%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
35.92%
G&A growth above 1.5x CSIQ's 1.15%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while CSIQ shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
18.13%
Similar operating expenses growth to CSIQ's 23.60%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
52.94%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CSIQ's 11.59%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
5.24%
Interest expense growth less than half of CSIQ's 15.47%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
6.33%
D&A growth less than half of CSIQ's 50.17%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-422.89%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-346.11%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7584.19%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5756.91%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.65%
Other expenses reduction while CSIQ shows 38.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-398.60%
Pre-tax income decline while CSIQ shows 15.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-280.03%
Pre-tax margin decline while CSIQ shows 6.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
243.54%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x CSIQ's 9.41%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-6871.81%
Net income decline while CSIQ shows 20.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5213.92%
Net margin decline while CSIQ shows 10.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6763.64%
EPS decline while CSIQ shows 14.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6763.64%
Diluted EPS decline while CSIQ shows 23.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.25%
Share count reduction below 50% of CSIQ's 0.41%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.25%
Diluted share increase while CSIQ reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.