PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.11%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x CSIQ's 3.70%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
9.83%
Cost growth 50-75% of CSIQ's 16.64%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
294.55%
Positive growth while CSIQ shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
231.25%
Margin expansion while CSIQ shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-16.98%
R&D reduction while CSIQ shows 61.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
100.00%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x CSIQ's 10.21%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.13%
Operating expenses reduction while CSIQ shows 10.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
54.35%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CSIQ's 16.10%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
6.46%
Interest expense growth while CSIQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.21%
D&A growth less than half of CSIQ's 38.94%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-313.72%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-247.35%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-262.81%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-204.60%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
110.40%
Other expenses growth while CSIQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-188.55%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-142.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-51.21%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-150.75%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-110.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-149.67%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-149.67%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.62%
Share count reduction below 50% of CSIQ's 0.16%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.62%
Diluted share increase while CSIQ reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.