PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
30.49%
Revenue growth 50-75% of CSIQ's 46.59%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
33.96%
Similar cost growth to CSIQ's 39.47%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
15.26%
Gross profit growth below 50% of CSIQ's 77.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-11.67%
Margin decline while CSIQ shows 20.76% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.28%
R&D growth less than half of CSIQ's 9.23%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-4.34%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.51%
Operating expenses reduction while CSIQ shows 5.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
27.56%
Similar total costs growth to CSIQ's 36.37%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
5.27%
Interest expense growth while CSIQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.08%
D&A growth above 1.5x CSIQ's 1.18%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
59.78%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of CSIQ's 110.16%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
22.45%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of CSIQ's 43.36%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
233.84%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x CSIQ's 130.56%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
155.83%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x CSIQ's 57.28%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.24%
Other expenses growth while CSIQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
181.41%
Pre-tax income growth 1.25-1.5x CSIQ's 124.92%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
162.39%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x CSIQ's 53.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.86%
Tax expense reduction while CSIQ shows 316.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
127.15%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x CSIQ's 86.80%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
74.07%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x CSIQ's 27.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
118.18%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x CSIQ's 85.29%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
122.22%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x CSIQ's 84.21%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
1.12%
Share count reduction below 50% of CSIQ's 0.32%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
6.90%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of CSIQ's 0.30%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.