PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.21%
Revenue decline while CSIQ shows 33.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
2.40%
Cost growth less than half of CSIQ's 33.86%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-11.62%
Gross profit decline while CSIQ shows 31.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-11.43%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
21.46%
R&D growth while CSIQ reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-0.50%
G&A reduction while CSIQ shows 98.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.87%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CSIQ's 49.79%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.52%
Total costs growth less than half of CSIQ's 35.55%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
3.28%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x CSIQ's 0.98%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
18.83%
D&A growth above 1.5x CSIQ's 3.70%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-5686.01%
EBITDA decline while CSIQ shows 9.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5697.79%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.04%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-271.71%
Other expenses reduction while CSIQ shows 64.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-115.91%
Pre-tax income decline while CSIQ shows 29.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-116.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5596.81%
Tax expense growth while CSIQ reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-965.36%
Net income decline while CSIQ shows 70.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-967.18%
Net margin decline while CSIQ shows 27.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-920.00%
EPS decline while CSIQ shows 68.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1125.00%
Diluted EPS decline while CSIQ shows 70.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.56%
Share count reduction below 50% of CSIQ's 0.20%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-13.07%
Diluted share reduction while CSIQ shows 5.29% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.