1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.54%
Revenue decline while CSIQ shows 31.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
11.49%
Cost growth less than half of CSIQ's 27.23%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-67.59%
Gross profit decline while CSIQ shows 58.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-67.08%
Margin decline while CSIQ shows 19.90% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
29.59%
R&D growth above 1.5x CSIQ's 18.82%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
30.25%
G&A growth while CSIQ reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.21%
Operating expenses growth while CSIQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.65%
Total costs growth 50-75% of CSIQ's 23.94%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
22.81%
Interest expense growth 50-75% of CSIQ's 31.23%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
8.76%
D&A growth less than half of CSIQ's 484.65%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-420.15%
EBITDA decline while CSIQ shows 241.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-428.28%
EBITDA margin decline while CSIQ shows 158.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-167.27%
Operating income decline while CSIQ shows 240.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-171.45%
Operating margin decline while CSIQ shows 158.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.16%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-134.03%
Pre-tax income decline while CSIQ shows 250.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-137.69%
Pre-tax margin decline while CSIQ shows 166.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.56%
Tax expense reduction while CSIQ shows 902.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-126.58%
Net income decline while CSIQ shows 105.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-130.12%
Net margin decline while CSIQ shows 55.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-129.27%
EPS decline while CSIQ shows 105.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-126.83%
Diluted EPS decline while CSIQ shows 98.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.48%
Share count reduction while CSIQ shows 0.08% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.13%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of CSIQ's 0.14%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.