PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
48.13%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x CSIQ's 31.75%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
44.17%
Similar cost growth to CSIQ's 43.45%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
268.96%
Positive growth while CSIQ shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
149.08%
Margin expansion while CSIQ shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.75%
R&D growth while CSIQ reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-0.44%
G&A reduction while CSIQ shows 0.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.72%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CSIQ's 21.34%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
34.81%
Similar total costs growth to CSIQ's 40.39%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-2.10%
Interest expense reduction while CSIQ shows 25.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.02%
D&A growth less than half of CSIQ's 142.79%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
45.47%
EBITDA growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
63.19%
EBITDA margin growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.68%
Operating income growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.68%
Operating margin growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
26.80%
Other expenses growth while CSIQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.06%
Pre-tax income growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
41.98%
Pre-tax margin growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-331.92%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
42.14%
Net income growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
60.94%
Net margin growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
41.79%
EPS growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
41.79%
Diluted EPS growth while CSIQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.05%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x CSIQ's 0.77%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.05%
Diluted share increase while CSIQ reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.