PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.35%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-4.05%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-38.74%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.89%
Margin decline while CSIQ shows 5.71% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
30.34%
R&D growth while CSIQ reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while CSIQ shows 48.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
18.65%
Operating expenses growth while CSIQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.76%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-10.47%
Interest expense reduction while CSIQ shows 1.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.05%
D&A growth less than half of CSIQ's 36.00%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-259.08%
EBITDA decline while CSIQ shows 18.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-279.44%
EBITDA margin decline while CSIQ shows 37.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-279.01%
Operating income decline while CSIQ shows 7.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-301.93%
Operating margin decline while CSIQ shows 24.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-37.28%
Other expenses reduction while CSIQ shows 26.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-954.79%
Pre-tax income decline while CSIQ shows 14.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1064.21%
Pre-tax margin decline while CSIQ shows 32.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
142.96%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x CSIQ's 31.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-817.67%
Net income decline while CSIQ shows 7.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-909.53%
Net margin decline while CSIQ shows 24.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-825.00%
EPS decline while CSIQ shows 7.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-825.00%
Diluted EPS decline while CSIQ shows 5.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.17%
Share count reduction below 50% of CSIQ's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.56%
Diluted share reduction while CSIQ shows 0.16% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.