PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
131.08%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 1.99%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
47.11%
Cost growth above 1.5x ENPH's 4.41%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
51.20%
Positive growth while ENPH shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
78.88%
Margin expansion while ENPH shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-33.32%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
100.00%
Marketing expense growth while ENPH reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.37%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
25.45%
Total costs growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
100.00%
Interest expense growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
92.71%
D&A growth above 1.5x ENPH's 0.85%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
74.59%
EBITDA growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
89.00%
EBITDA margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
55.54%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 26.34%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
80.76%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 23.88%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-193.11%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
30.41%
Pre-tax income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
69.89%
Pre-tax margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Tax expense growth while ENPH reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.86%
Net income growth 50-75% of ENPH's 24.63%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
63.16%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 22.20%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1378.57%
EPS decline while ENPH shows 21.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1378.57%
Diluted EPS decline while ENPH shows 22.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-94.15%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-94.15%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.