PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
43.00%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 1.99%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
46.70%
Cost growth above 1.5x ENPH's 4.41%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
23.23%
Positive growth while ENPH shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-13.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
234.90%
R&D growth while ENPH reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.64%
Operating expenses growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
38.89%
Total costs growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-46.85%
D&A reduction while ENPH shows 0.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-46.31%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-62.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
49.67%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 26.34%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
64.80%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 23.88%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-28.66%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
114.77%
Pre-tax income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
110.33%
Pre-tax margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
102.39%
Tax expense growth while ENPH reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
139.84%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 24.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
127.86%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 22.20%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
110.69%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 21.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
109.67%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 22.73%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
162.28%
Share count increase while ENPH reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
187.19%
Diluted share increase while ENPH reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.