PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
22.07%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 1.99%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
30.98%
Cost growth above 1.5x ENPH's 4.41%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-8.12%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.73%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.92%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.91%
Operating expenses growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
38.26%
Total costs growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-21.12%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
6.95%
D&A growth above 1.5x ENPH's 0.85%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-97.51%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-97.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-437.48%
Operating income decline while ENPH shows 26.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-340.30%
Operating margin decline while ENPH shows 23.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-47.85%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-856.90%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-683.88%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-184.09%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-531.05%
Net income decline while ENPH shows 24.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-453.11%
Net margin decline while ENPH shows 22.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-455.50%
EPS decline while ENPH shows 21.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-455.50%
Diluted EPS decline while ENPH shows 22.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.89%
Share count increase while ENPH reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.06%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.