PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.26%
Revenue decline while ENPH shows 1.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-9.58%
Cost reduction while ENPH shows 4.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
22.85%
Positive growth while ENPH shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
28.33%
Margin expansion while ENPH shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-149.74%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.80%
Operating expenses growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.33%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.15%
D&A growth above 1.5x ENPH's 0.85%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
40.41%
EBITDA growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
46.66%
EBITDA margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
64.97%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 26.34%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
72.32%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 23.88%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-226.15%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-24.85%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
79.73%
Tax expense growth while ENPH reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-42.17%
Net income decline while ENPH shows 24.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-39.59%
Net margin decline while ENPH shows 22.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.00%
EPS decline while ENPH shows 21.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-42.80%
Diluted EPS decline while ENPH shows 22.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.93%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.67%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.