1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.37%
Revenue decline while ENPH shows 1.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-6.16%
Cost reduction while ENPH shows 4.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
13.53%
Positive growth while ENPH shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
15.11%
Margin expansion while ENPH shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
25.68%
R&D growth while ENPH reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.54%
Operating expenses growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.03%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-5.81%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
12.37%
D&A growth above 1.5x ENPH's 0.85%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
14.37%
EBITDA growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.97%
EBITDA margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.86%
Operating income growth 50-75% of ENPH's 26.34%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
20.51%
Similar operating margin growth to ENPH's 23.88%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-567.55%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.74%
Pre-tax income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.15%
Pre-tax margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
187.05%
Tax expense growth while ENPH reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-20.79%
Net income decline while ENPH shows 24.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.68%
Net margin decline while ENPH shows 22.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.08%
EPS decline while ENPH shows 21.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.62%
Diluted EPS decline while ENPH shows 22.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.33%
Share count increase while ENPH reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.54%
Diluted share increase while ENPH reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.