PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
39.22%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 1.99%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
3.90%
Similar cost growth to ENPH's 4.41%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
64.11%
Positive growth while ENPH shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
17.87%
Margin expansion while ENPH shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-13.03%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
0.79%
G&A growth while ENPH reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.49%
Other expenses growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.14%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
42.58%
Total costs growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
55.68%
Interest expense growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.04%
D&A growth above 1.5x ENPH's 0.85%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
494.36%
EBITDA growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
383.25%
EBITDA margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
49.95%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 26.34%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
64.05%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 23.88%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
887.44%
Other expenses growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
271.95%
Pre-tax income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
223.50%
Pre-tax margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
121.12%
Tax expense growth while ENPH reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
245.39%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 24.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
204.43%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 22.20%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
325.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 21.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
316.67%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 22.73%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
8.51%
Share count increase while ENPH reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.51%
Diluted share increase while ENPH reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.