PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
56.67%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 1.99%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
57.81%
Cost growth above 1.5x ENPH's 4.41%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
56.16%
Positive growth while ENPH shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
20.39%
R&D growth while ENPH reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
6.07%
G&A growth while ENPH reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.15%
Other expenses growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.08%
Operating expenses growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
40.01%
Total costs growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.35%
Interest expense growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.62%
D&A growth above 1.5x ENPH's 0.85%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
634.58%
EBITDA growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
368.88%
EBITDA margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
482.57%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 26.34%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
344.19%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 23.88%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-93.32%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
46.82%
Pre-tax income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
272.18%
Tax expense growth while ENPH reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
36.18%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x ENPH's 24.63%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-13.08%
Net margin decline while ENPH shows 22.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.15%
EPS decline while ENPH shows 21.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-50.00%
Diluted EPS decline while ENPH shows 22.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.18%
Share count increase while ENPH reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.13%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.