1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-36.46%
Revenue decline while ENPH shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-86.53%
Cost reduction while ENPH shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
223.64%
Growth of 223.64% while ENPH shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
409.35%
Margin change of 409.35% while ENPH shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
21.36%
R&D change of 21.36% while ENPH maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.34%
Operating expenses change of 9.34% while ENPH maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-33.50%
Total costs reduction while ENPH shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
7.97%
Interest expense change of 7.97% while ENPH maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
3.56%
D&A change of 3.56% while ENPH maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-59.65%
EBITDA decline while ENPH shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-36.50%
EBITDA margin decline while ENPH shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-114.78%
Operating income decline while ENPH shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-123.26%
Operating margin decline while ENPH shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-61.56%
Other expenses reduction while ENPH shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-352.56%
Pre-tax income decline while ENPH shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-497.49%
Pre-tax margin decline while ENPH shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-395.51%
Tax expense reduction while ENPH shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1213.79%
Income change of 1213.79% while ENPH is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
1967.67%
Margin change of 1967.67% while ENPH is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
737.25%
EPS change of 737.25% while ENPH is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
737.25%
Diluted EPS change of 737.25% while ENPH is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
0.26%
Share count change of 0.26% while ENPH is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.07%
Diluted share change of 0.07% while ENPH is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.