PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-51.83%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-48.11%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-62.76%
Gross profit decline while ENPH shows 20.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-22.70%
Margin decline while ENPH shows 37.26% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.19%
R&D reduction while ENPH shows 20.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-67.25%
G&A reduction while ENPH shows 64.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
100.00%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x ENPH's 21.91%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
128.20%
Other expenses change of 128.20% while ENPH maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-12.25%
Operating expenses reduction while ENPH shows 30.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-43.53%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
48.75%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x ENPH's 1.08%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-11.34%
D&A reduction while ENPH shows 15.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-88.81%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-76.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.96%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-102.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-205.48%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-115.88%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-132.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-507.42%
Tax expense reduction while ENPH shows 32.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-101.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-102.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-101.54%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-101.54%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.83%
Share count increase while ENPH reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.75%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.