PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-20.13%
Revenue decline while ENPH shows 27.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-17.51%
Cost reduction while ENPH shows 21.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-41.85%
Gross profit decline while ENPH shows 53.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-27.19%
Margin decline while ENPH shows 19.78% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-5.33%
R&D reduction while ENPH shows 11.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.01%
Operating expenses growth less than half of ENPH's 12.84%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-42.76%
Total costs reduction while ENPH shows 19.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.84%
Interest expense growth less than half of ENPH's 55.76%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-35.92%
D&A reduction while ENPH shows 25.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
88.68%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 49.92%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
85.83%
EBITDA margin growth 1.25-1.5x ENPH's 65.34%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
84.65%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 40.48%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
80.78%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 53.41%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-922.04%
Other expenses reduction while ENPH shows 55.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
78.65%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 22.84%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
73.26%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 39.59%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-62.66%
Tax expense reduction while ENPH shows 524.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
77.59%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 22.84%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
71.94%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 39.59%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
77.72%
Similar EPS growth to ENPH's 97.06%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
77.72%
Similar diluted EPS growth to ENPH's 97.06%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-0.54%
Share count reduction while ENPH shows 2514.16% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.54%
Diluted share reduction while ENPH shows 2514.16% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.