PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-12.29%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-13.53%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
2.22%
Positive growth while ENPH shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
16.55%
Margin expansion while ENPH shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
39.51%
R&D growth above 1.5x ENPH's 9.22%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.38%
Operating expenses growth less than half of ENPH's 9.98%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-10.93%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.50%
Interest expense growth less than half of ENPH's 7.17%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
34.36%
D&A growth above 1.5x ENPH's 7.21%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
44.68%
EBITDA growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.93%
EBITDA margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.04%
Operating income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.71%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.48%
Other expenses growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.44%
Pre-tax income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-67.21%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
10.29%
Net income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
20.24%
EPS growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.24%
Diluted EPS growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.39%
Share count increase while ENPH reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.39%
Diluted share increase while ENPH reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.