PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.27%
Revenue decline while ENPH shows 27.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-18.65%
Cost reduction while ENPH shows 25.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
81.85%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 33.46%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
100.43%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 4.58%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.03%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-11.49%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.84%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-17.40%
Total costs reduction while ENPH shows 15.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.00%
Interest expense reduction while ENPH shows 4.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.48%
D&A growth 1.1-1.25x ENPH's 2.95%. Bill Ackman would demand investment justification.
829.35%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 49.64%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
903.89%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 60.54%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
233.05%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 43.46%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
246.64%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 55.69%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
30.54%
Other expenses growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
113.24%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 38.65%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
114.59%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 51.93%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
50.75%
Tax expense growth while ENPH reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
135.77%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 38.54%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
139.43%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 51.84%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
134.78%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 40.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
132.61%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 40.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.71%
Share count reduction below 50% of ENPH's 1.14%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
12.03%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of ENPH's 1.14%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.