PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.89%
Revenue decline while ENPH shows 8.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
9.40%
Cost growth above 1.5x ENPH's 2.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-32.38%
Gross profit decline while ENPH shows 23.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-30.37%
Margin decline while ENPH shows 14.08% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
13.88%
R&D growth above 1.5x ENPH's 5.16%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
20.40%
G&A growth above 1.5x ENPH's 2.26%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.48%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ENPH's 1.44%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
10.93%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ENPH's 1.89%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-3.07%
Interest expense reduction while ENPH shows 53.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.22%
D&A growth less than half of ENPH's 6.05%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-53.56%
EBITDA decline while ENPH shows 106.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-52.18%
EBITDA margin decline while ENPH shows 103.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-67.05%
Operating income decline while ENPH shows 69.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-66.07%
Operating margin decline while ENPH shows 72.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
19.68%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x ENPH's 3.93%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-86.15%
Pre-tax income decline while ENPH shows 61.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-85.74%
Pre-tax margin decline while ENPH shows 64.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
296.39%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x ENPH's 195.04%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-79.39%
Net income decline while ENPH shows 55.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-78.78%
Net margin decline while ENPH shows 58.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-79.78%
EPS decline while ENPH shows 55.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-79.45%
Diluted EPS decline while ENPH shows 55.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.12%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 0.61%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-1.65%
Diluted share reduction while ENPH shows 0.61% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.