PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
30.49%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x ENPH's 20.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
33.96%
Cost growth above 1.5x ENPH's 20.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
15.26%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of ENPH's 21.20%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-11.67%
Margin decline while ENPH shows 0.28% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.28%
R&D growth less than half of ENPH's 8.65%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-4.34%
G&A reduction while ENPH shows 12.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.51%
Operating expenses reduction while ENPH shows 4.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
27.56%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ENPH's 15.06%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
5.27%
Interest expense growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.08%
D&A growth 1.25-1.5x ENPH's 5.52%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize asset base.
59.78%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ENPH's 905.44%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.45%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ENPH's 741.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
233.84%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x ENPH's 176.09%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
155.83%
Similar operating margin growth to ENPH's 162.95%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
2.24%
Other expenses growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
181.41%
Pre-tax income growth 1.25-1.5x ENPH's 132.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
162.39%
Pre-tax margin growth 1.25-1.5x ENPH's 126.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-1.86%
Tax expense reduction while ENPH shows 10.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
127.15%
Similar net income growth to ENPH's 126.82%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
74.07%
Net margin growth 50-75% of ENPH's 122.19%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
118.18%
Similar EPS growth to ENPH's 128.13%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
122.22%
Similar diluted EPS growth to ENPH's 128.13%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
1.12%
Share count reduction below 50% of ENPH's 1.13%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
6.90%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 14.39%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.