PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.81%
Positive growth while ENPH shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-5.85%
Cost reduction while ENPH shows 4.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
153.84%
Positive growth while ENPH shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
146.91%
Margin expansion while ENPH shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.06%
R&D growth less than half of ENPH's 4.16%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-7.43%
G&A reduction while ENPH shows 2.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.44%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.30%
Total costs reduction while ENPH shows 2.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
19.25%
Interest expense growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.64%
D&A growth while ENPH reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
47.82%
EBITDA growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
49.24%
EBITDA margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.02%
Operating income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
34.85%
Operating margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-38.65%
Other expenses reduction while ENPH shows 739.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
25.77%
Pre-tax income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
27.80%
Pre-tax margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-88.95%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
33.08%
Net income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
34.90%
Net margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
34.04%
EPS growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.33%
Diluted EPS growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.01%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 2.14%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.40%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 1.55%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.