PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
73.47%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 12.00%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
58.28%
Cost growth above 1.5x ENPH's 11.92%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
212.90%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 12.33%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
80.38%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 0.30%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-10.37%
R&D reduction while ENPH shows 0.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-5.45%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.78%
Operating expenses reduction while ENPH shows 3.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
43.73%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ENPH's 9.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
13.35%
Interest expense growth less than half of ENPH's 482.08%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.62%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
73.83%
EBITDA growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
84.91%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 20.32%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
86.36%
Operating income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
92.14%
Operating margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-192.16%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
30.10%
Pre-tax income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
59.70%
Pre-tax margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.03%
Tax expense growth while ENPH reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
42.07%
Net income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
66.61%
Net margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
43.14%
EPS growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
43.14%
Diluted EPS growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.09%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 1.41%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.09%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 1.41%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.