PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
40.52%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 2.16%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
76.12%
Cost growth above 1.5x ENPH's 2.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-124.82%
Gross profit decline while ENPH shows 2.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-117.66%
Margin decline while ENPH shows 0.07% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-15.25%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-16.93%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.49%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
61.97%
Total costs growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.41%
Interest expense growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
28.98%
D&A growth while ENPH reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2230.96%
EBITDA decline while ENPH shows 41.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1558.79%
EBITDA margin decline while ENPH shows 38.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2818.90%
Operating income decline while ENPH shows 43.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1977.19%
Operating margin decline while ENPH shows 44.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
83.06%
Other expenses growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-368.72%
Pre-tax income decline while ENPH shows 33.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-233.56%
Pre-tax margin decline while ENPH shows 34.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-235.61%
Tax expense reduction while ENPH shows 421.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-578.55%
Net income decline while ENPH shows 29.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-382.88%
Net margin decline while ENPH shows 31.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-586.21%
EPS decline while ENPH shows 47.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-586.21%
Diluted EPS decline while ENPH shows 47.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.17%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 30.89%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.17%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 30.89%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.