PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-67.89%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-59.32%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-214.64%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-879.86%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.02%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
1.33%
G&A growth while ENPH reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.72%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-52.59%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
15.54%
Interest expense growth less than half of ENPH's 81.12%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-19.70%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
26.44%
EBITDA growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-129.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
51.95%
Operating income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-49.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
21.51%
Other expenses growth less than half of ENPH's 53.97%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
51.02%
Pre-tax income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-52.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
121.25%
Tax expense growth while ENPH reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
51.12%
Net income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-52.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
51.26%
EPS growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
51.26%
Diluted EPS growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.33%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 23.87%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.33%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 23.87%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.