PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.34%
Revenue decline while ENPH shows 36.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-25.07%
Cost reduction while ENPH shows 28.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
105.72%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x ENPH's 92.21%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
105.74%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 40.87%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-3.71%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
1.93%
G&A growth while ENPH reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.61%
Operating expenses growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-24.51%
Total costs reduction while ENPH shows 15.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
7.67%
Interest expense growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.70%
D&A growth while ENPH reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
73.10%
EBITDA growth 1.25-1.5x ENPH's 63.09%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
73.01%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to ENPH's 78.36%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
46.08%
Similar operating income growth to ENPH's 58.15%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
45.90%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of ENPH's 69.33%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-424.62%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
23.06%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ENPH's 51.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.80%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ENPH's 64.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.85%
Tax expense growth less than half of ENPH's 551.91%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
30.28%
Net income growth 50-75% of ENPH's 48.11%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
30.04%
Net margin growth below 50% of ENPH's 61.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.93%
EPS growth 50-75% of ENPH's 53.33%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
30.93%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of ENPH's 53.33%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
0.39%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 10.15%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.39%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 10.15%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.