PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
35.46%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 3.42%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
44.94%
Cost growth above 1.5x ENPH's 0.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-171.55%
Gross profit decline while ENPH shows 15.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-152.82%
Margin decline while ENPH shows 11.54% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.20%
R&D reduction while ENPH shows 10.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
6.03%
G&A growth 50-75% of ENPH's 9.96%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.65%
Similar operating expenses growth to ENPH's 4.59%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
38.30%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ENPH's 1.20%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
12.19%
Similar interest expense growth to ENPH's 11.19%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
21.71%
D&A growth above 1.5x ENPH's 2.80%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-2510.65%
EBITDA decline while ENPH shows 110.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1827.29%
EBITDA margin decline while ENPH shows 284.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-930.10%
Operating income decline while ENPH shows 63.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-660.46%
Operating margin decline while ENPH shows 65.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
42.83%
Other expenses growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-653.72%
Pre-tax income decline while ENPH shows 44.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-456.43%
Pre-tax margin decline while ENPH shows 46.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
47.41%
Tax expense growth while ENPH reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-948.31%
Net income decline while ENPH shows 57.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-673.91%
Net margin decline while ENPH shows 58.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-946.15%
EPS decline while ENPH shows 57.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-943.59%
Diluted EPS decline while ENPH shows 57.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.00%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 0.97%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.07%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 0.97%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.