PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.67%
Revenue growth below 50% of ENPH's 18.32%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
10.97%
Cost growth 50-75% of ENPH's 21.59%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
-177.61%
Gross profit decline while ENPH shows 11.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-172.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.80%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-29.30%
G&A reduction while ENPH shows 2.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.53%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
19.12%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x ENPH's 13.14%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
16.34%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x ENPH's 5.51%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-2.76%
D&A reduction while ENPH shows 9.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
7.87%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ENPH's 435.94%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.64%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ENPH's 28.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
33.93%
Operating income growth below 50% of ENPH's 1437.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
38.06%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ENPH's 1230.61%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-371.19%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-65.33%
Pre-tax income decline while ENPH shows 139.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-54.99%
Pre-tax margin decline while ENPH shows 133.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-327.69%
Tax expense reduction while ENPH shows 132.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-76.09%
Net income decline while ENPH shows 120.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-65.08%
Net margin decline while ENPH shows 117.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.00%
EPS decline while ENPH shows 129.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.00%
Diluted EPS decline while ENPH shows 129.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.08%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 3.74%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.08%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 10.79%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.