PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-23.77%
Revenue decline while ENPH shows 8.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-16.99%
Cost reduction while ENPH shows 4.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-392.47%
Gross profit decline while ENPH shows 18.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-546.07%
Margin decline while ENPH shows 9.08% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.72%
R&D reduction while ENPH shows 16.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
16.75%
G&A growth 50-75% of ENPH's 28.91%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.31%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of ENPH's 19.50%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-23.78%
Total costs reduction while ENPH shows 8.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-44.43%
Interest expense reduction while ENPH shows 35.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.54%
D&A growth less than half of ENPH's 31.47%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-72.14%
EBITDA decline while ENPH shows 10.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-125.84%
EBITDA margin decline while ENPH shows 49.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-116.79%
Operating income decline while ENPH shows 42.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-184.41%
Operating margin decline while ENPH shows 31.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
113.65%
Other expenses growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
44.12%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ENPH's 142.26%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
26.70%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ENPH's 123.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
169.18%
Tax expense growth while ENPH reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
43.28%
Net income growth below 50% of ENPH's 289.99%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.58%
Net margin growth below 50% of ENPH's 259.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
43.75%
EPS growth below 50% of ENPH's 200.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
43.75%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ENPH's 100.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.41%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 1.46%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.41%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 1.73%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.